Best Coffee in South Scottsdale that isn't from Starbucks
Coffee Bean
Jamaican Coffee
Dunkin Doughnut
Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf
Village Coffee
Daily Rush

Archive for the ‘Real Estate’ Category

Arizona effort aims to avoid foreclosures

Thursday, April 19th, 2007

 

My Take:

It’s a shame that people who recently purchased a home are facing foreclosure. I honestly don’t know what effect the increase in foreclosures is going to have in South Scottsdale becasue it seems to be more of a problem in the outlying cities (Queen Creek, Buckeye, Maricopa) . There aren’t many foreclosures in Scottsdale.

If I were to give some advice, to someone facing foreclosure, that would be to do something and not to ignore it. Lots of people facing foreclosure ignore it and hope it will go away. It’s not going away. Call your lender and see if something can be worked out. Banks and lenders can be reasonable if you try to work with them and show them your trying to correct the situation. That might mean selling your home or working out a revised payment plan. Trust me when I say, lenders don’t want to foreclose on home owners. It’s not their business. They want to make loans not sell homes.


Catherine Reagor
The Arizona Republic
Apr. 19, 2007 12:00 AM

A grass-roots campaign to help Arizona homeowners with bad loans stave off foreclosure launches today.

Armed with lists of people in the Valley and Tucson with subprime loans, members of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now plan to go door to door, offering help.

“We want homeowners facing foreclosure to know they have options,” said Sophia Tesch, a Mesa ACORN member. “There are many Valley victims of mortgage fraud and predatory lending.

Foreclosures in metro Phoenix increased tenfold in the past year. The number of people in danger of losing their homes is at a four-year high.

ACORN’s national Stop Foreclosures Campaign kicks off in Arizona at 10 a.m. on the state Capitol lawn. Similar campaigns are being launched in other cities with foreclosure problems.

ACORN is also calling for a nationwide one-year moratorium on predatory-loan foreclosures. The group’s help line is 1-866-67ACORN.

Home sales continue slump

Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

My take:

Surprisingly, even with the slump in overall sales, home appreciation continues to be up and that has a lot to do with the desirability of South Scottsdale. With the Sky Song starting construction and Scottsdale Water Front almost completed, South Scottsdale is more and more, becoming a centerpiece for work and entertainment.

Peter Corbett
The Arizona Republic
Apr. 10, 2007 11:06 AM

A slump in Scottsdale-area home sales continued in March with a 15 percent drop from a year ago, according to a report released Tuesday from Realty Studies at Arizona State University.

Still, median prices for single-family homes were up 6.7 percent from a year ago to $635,000.

Scottsdale condominium and townhouse sales also dipped 26 percent in March but prices were up a fraction to $265,950.

“While the resale market is tracking near historical norms, the levels should be well below those of the last few years,” said Jay Butler, Realty Studies director. “The current market lacks the market frenzy to own and/or invest at almost any price and reasoning.”

There were 465 homes sales in the Scottsdale area in March and 280 condos and townhouses sold.

Paradise Valley’s median home price of $1.6 million was up less than a half-percent over last March.

The median price Valley wide edged up 2.1 percent to $265,470. But sales were off 26 percent.

The median price is the midpoint in sales, with half the homes costing more and half costing less.

.

Real Estate sales report for South Scottsdale and the Valley

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007

My Take:
Its interesting to see what is going on in Scottsdale and South Scottsdale in relation to other cities in the Valley. Hopefully, the local real estate market will improve in 2007.

banner-2.jpg

Greater Phoenix resale numbers start 2007 above 2003 levels

Tuesday, February 13, 2007
MESA, Ariz. — As the new year began, the local resale housing market continued to slip with 4,520 sales recorded in January. This is down from the 4,620 sales of December 2006 and the 5,260 recordings of a year ago.

This is the lowest monthly level for January since 4,220 sales were reported in 2003, which was the year that the hyper-market began in the local area. Relying on January data as an indicator of the coming year is not wise, according to Jay Q. Butler, director of Realty Studies at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus.

“January sales are traditionally below the recordings of December, which are based on the push to get people into their homes for the holidays,” said Butler. “Because recordings are based on decisions made months before, January tends to be the depository of limited desire to look for and buy a home following the holiday season and a poor indicator of the coming year, which is better set by the traditionally strong month of March.”

If 2007 is to follow the traditional pattern, listings should be increasing with a corresponding improvement in buyer activity. However, the levels should be well below those of the last few years, because the current market lacks the market frenzy to own and/or invest at almost any price and reasoning.

“As long as the international economy and political situation remains stable, the general expectation is that 2007 resale housing market should be a good year, but no where near the records,” said Butler.

Much like the sales activity, the median home price has been very stable at $260,000, an improvement from December’s $255,900 and last year’s $257,000. Although this is the first year-to-year improvement since August 2006, several areas are continuing to show declining price activity. For January 2007, 15 percent of all recorded sales were for homes priced from $125,000 to $199,999, 43 percent for $200,000 to $299,999 and 39 percent for homes priced more than $300,000.

Last year, the distribution was 20 percent of all recorded sales were for homes priced from $125,000 to $199,999, 40 percent for $200,000 to $299,999 and 36 percent for homes priced more than $300,000. The increase in the higher price levels demonstrates how the move-up market tends to become more obvious in a slowing market. Since the greater Phoenix area is so large, the median price can range significantly from $665,000 ($657,000 in December) in North Scottsdale to $148,000 ($150,000 in December) in the Sky Harbor area of the city of Phoenix.

Current home prices and interest rates are very comparable to a year ago, with the monthly payment of $1,300 unchanged. Even though mortgage interest rates have been declining for the last few months, limited home appreciation and household income continues to raise concern about the ability of some homeowners to maintain their homes. This may be especially evident for those that have used some of the more creative financing instruments, such as option payment plans and initially low interest rate adjustable mortgages.

During the last few years, the townhouse/condominium market has had increased popularity for owner-occupancy, especially for young and minority households, and investors. This housing sector also has remained very stable with 850 sales for January 2007, while it stood at 880 sales for December 2006, but well below last year’s 1,225 sales. The median home price has been very stable at $175,000, while it was $165,000 for a year ago.

The median square footage for a single-family home recorded sold in January 2007 was 1,700 square feet, which is larger then the 1,620 square feet for a year ago. The larger size further demonstrates the role of the move-up sector in the local housing market. In the townhouse/condominium sector, the median square footage was 1,110 square feet which is bigger than 1,090 square feet reported a year ago.

* In contrast to January 2006, recorded sales in the city of Phoenix decreased from 1,610 sales to 1,305 sales, while the median sales price increased to $225,000 from $205,000 for a year ago. Since Phoenix is a geographically large city, the median prices can range significantly such as $148,000 in the Sky Harbor area to $353,500 ($315,000 in December) in the Union Hills area. The townhouse/condominium sector decreased from 430 to 300 sales, while the median price increased from $139,525 to $150,500.

* The Scottsdale resale home market declined from 400 to 360 recorded sales, with the median sales price decreasing from last year’s $600,000 to $550,000. The median resale home price is $665,000 ($657,000 in December) in North Scottsdale and $308,000 ($350,000 in December) in South Scottsdale. The townhouse/condominium sector in Scottsdale also decreased from 200 to 190 sales and the median sales price decreased from $275,700 to $272,500.

* The Mesa resale housing market declined from 615 to 475 sales, and the median price fell from $240,000 to $235,000 ($241,000 in December). The townhouse/condominium sector also fell from 200 to 110 sales, while the median home price increased from $149,000 to $165,000.

* Glendale decreased from 410 in January 2006 to 335 sales, but the median sales price improved slightly, from $238,500 to $239,450 ($244,900 in December). The townhouse/condominium sector was stable at 50 sales, while the median sales price increased from $130,000 to $139,150.

* For the city of Peoria, the resale market increased from 195 sales to 225 sales, while the median price moved from $247,250 to $260,000 ($258,450 in December). The townhouse/condominium sector remained at 25 sales and the median price went from $152,500 to $161,000.

* In comparison to a year ago, the Sun City resale market fell from 100 to 80 sales, with the median sales price decreasing to $190,000 from $212,000. As resale activity in Sun City West stayed at 40 sales, the median sales price decreased from $243,500 to $238,725. The townhouse/condominium market in Sun City declined from 60 to 45 recorded sales, while the median home price decreased from $140,000 to $133,500. In Sun City West, activity remained at 15 sales and the median sales price decreased from $203,450 to $151,000.

* The resale market in Gilbert decreased from 310 to 280 sales, and the median sales price decreased from $337,250 to $319,000 ($328,000 in December). The townhouse/condominium market fell from 15 to 10 sales as the median sales price decreased from $212,500 to $195,750.

* For the city of Chandler, the resale market stayed at 330 recorded sales, while the median sales price also was stable at $305,000 ($282,900 in December). The townhouse/condominium market declined from 45 to 30 sales, and the median sales price improved slightly from $177,750 to $178,000.

* The resale market in Tempe decreased from 140 to 100 sales, with the median sales price increasing from $269,900 to $282,950 ($272,750 in December). The townhouse/condominium sector slowed from 110 to 30 sales and the median sales price increased from $181,000 to $201,000.

* The highest median sales price was in Paradise Valley at $1,425,000 with a median square foot house of 3,010 square feet.

* In the West Valley, the following communities represent 9 percent of the resale market.

o Avondale fell from 150 to 90 sales with the median price moving from $258,000 to $243,950 ($245,000 in December).

o El Mirage decreased from 70 to 65 sales, while the median home price went from $224,000 to $202,000 ($209,750 in December 2006).

o Goodyear declined from 100 to 70 sales, while the median price decreased from $275,000 to $260,000 ($257,000 in December 2006).

o Surprise increased from 165 sales ($249,000) to 205 sales ($247,235), while it was $232,500 in December.

Zillow’s zany zestimates.

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

My Take:

Here is a great article about Zillow.com which is a good website for looking at the values for your home and your neighborhood. Luckily, in Arizona, home sales do become public information and everybody can see what homes are selling for. A couple of things to keep in mind about Zillow, the information on recent sales lags about 4-8 weeks and in older neighborhoods, like in most of South Scottsdale, the amount of remodeling and updating can vary greatly from home to home and thats not always reflected in Zillow’s home value estimates.

By Lesley Mitchell
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake TribuneArticle Last Updated:01/27/2007 11:30:08 AM MST
It’s easy to see why Zillow.com is one of the most popular real estate sites on the Web.
Americans are preoccupied with real estate these days and with how fast they are building equity, compared with everyone else.
At Zillow.com, anyone can type in an address - to their own home or one owned by their neighbor, business associate or even their boss - and get an estimate of what that property is worth.
But Utahns should take Zillow’s estimates- called Zestimates - with a healthy dose of skepticism, although that’s not necessarily Zillow’s fault.
Zillow has problems coming up with accurate home values in 10 states, including Utah, where selling prices are closely guarded by the state’s real estate agents and not considered public information.
“In Utah, we’re taking our best guess,” said Amanda Hoffman, a Zillow.com spokeswoman. “We have quite a ways to go in terms of accuracy.”
Ryan Money, a Salt Lake City technology entrepreneur, found out that the hard way. Money first logged on to Zillow last year, where he was shocked to see his Sugar House home listed for a value of $1.8 million, at 1,900 square feet.
His home actually has 2,400 square feet and at the time probably was worth about $300,000, he said. Later in the year, Zillow updated the value of his home, listing its value at $258,000.
“I took a big hit from $1.8 million to $258,000,” he said, laughing.
Several weeks ago, Money refinanced his home and got an appraisal, which came in about $70,000 higher than Zillow’s current estimate of his property’s value.
So he took advantage of Zillow’s policy of allowing homeowners to dispute Zillow’s listing. But owner updates and comments do not immediately increase or decrease Zillow’s estimate of a home’s value.
Money, who believes real estate data should be more public in Utah, said he still remains a Zillow fan. “They obviously have some work to do, but it is such an interesting tool.”
Because Zillow cannot with a great degree of accuracy pinpoint home-sale data in Utah and nine other nondisclosure states, Zillow uses other sources of data - although it will not divulge exactly what information that is. Zillow touts a complicated formula that relies on a number of factors to determine value.
But the results are often questionable. A West Valley home listed on Zillow at a value of $242,000 recently sold for $195,000. Zillow listed the property as having 1,691 square feet; it actually has 1,800 square feet.
Or take the 4,700-square-foot Salt Lake City home recently listed for nearly $1.6 million that went under contract in six days close to the list price. Zillow lists its value at $776,787, with about 3,672 square feet.
Realtor Dave Winters said he doesn’t think Zillow is worth much as a real estate valuation tool. He said it is frustrating when buyers log on to Zillow and want to get a property for the price the Web site lists. The site, he says, has on many occasions listed an artificially low price that no seller would accept.
“Zillow is incredibly inaccurate,” he said. “It’s inaccurate to such a degree that it’s ridiculous.”
The chances of Zillow increasing its accuracy in Utah, however, appear to be slim.
In Utah, values set by a county assessor’s offices for property tax purposes are public information, as is the amount of the mortgage taken out on a property.
But assessed values can, in some cases, be very inaccurate measures of market value. And because buyers make down payments of such varying amounts, the amount of the mortgage taken out on a property is a less-than-accurate way to try and figure out market value.
Selling prices, most agree, really are the key to determining a property’s value, but Zillow’s chances of getting that data in Utah are not good.
Chris Kyler, legal counsel to the Utah Association of Realtors, said Utah’s status as a nondisclosure state is secure. Only those with access to the Wasatch Front Regional Multiple Listing Service can tap into selling price data and share it with whom they choose.
And he says the Legislature - many of whose members are real estate agents - have no plans to change that.
Kyler insists it is not control issue.
“We always have been [a nondisclosure state] and probably always will be,” he said. “We still really value privacy. It’s still one of the hallmark values supported by the Legislature.”
Kyler said in the age of identity theft, the less personal information that is released, the better.
Realtor groups in other disclosure states, however, say they don’t really see any good reason for a state not to disclose selling prices.
In Arizona, where Zillow says it has four-star accuracy - its most accurate rating - selling prices are public information. In fact, addresses and selling prices of individual properties have been published in a Phoenix business weekly for all to see for years.
In Utah, where Zillow says it has only one-star accuracy - its least accurate rating - the most any newspaper can publish are selling prices along the Wasatch Front by Zip code area.
“In Arizona, Realtors say, ‘That’s just how it is,’ and we accept it,” said Ron LaMee, vice president of information services for the Arizona Association of Realtors. “I haven’t ever heard anyone say that selling prices are privileged information and that it shouldn’t be public information.”
Selling prices on individual properties in Arizona are disclosed -and become public information - at the time a sale is closed.
LaMee said some celebrities in Arizona “get a little ticked off by it” when they see their real estate transaction in the newspaper but there has been no organized effort by real estate agents to change Arizona law.
“Consumers want the information - I just can’t think of a good reason not to provide it to them,” he said.
But consumers in Utah shouldn’t expect to get it anytime soon. So for now, they can enjoy Zillow.com all they want. They just shouldn’t take it too seriously.
Those in Utah logging on to the popular site “should look at it as a starting point,” said Zillow’s Hoffman.
lesley@sltrib.com

What is it?
* Zillow.com is a real estate Web site launched in February 2006 that attracts 3 million to 4 million unique visitors per month and is among the top five most popular real estate sites.

Nondisclosure states
Utah is one of 10 states that restrict public disclosure of home-sale data, including selling prices of individual homes. Those states are:
* Alaska
* Idaho
* Kansas
* Louisiana
* Mississippi
* Montana
* New Mexico
* Texas
* UTAH
* Wyoming
Source: Zillow.com

Housing glut gives buyers upper hand

Thursday, January 25th, 2007

My take:
Right now the local real estate market is a buyers market. I’ve recently seen clients make purchases that appraised for substantially more then the sales price. The key for all three homes: each home had been on the market a long time (over 120 days) and all three were vacant. In all cases the sellers initially priced their homes very high. If a home is priced correctly and shows well it will sell.

Pat Chang

Housing glut gives buyers upper hand


James R. Hagerty and Ruth Simon
Wall Street Journal
Jan. 25, 2007 12:22 PM

Amid a continuing glut of homes for sale in most of the country, buyers should have plenty of choices and lots of bargaining power in the spring selling season - typically the busiest time of the year.

Many builders and real-estate brokers, for their part, hope the housing market will start recovering this year as buyers respond to price cuts and other sweeteners offered by increasingly nervous sellers. In some markets, agents say, buyer traffic has picked up in the last month or two.

But any recovery is likely to be gradual. Donald Tomnitz, chief executive officer of D.R. Horton Inc., a home builder, told investors this week that the market, which began slumping in 2005, may bottom out by mid-2007, but that “we don’t see any rapid improvement thereafter.”
advertisement

Given all that, sellers should expect buyers to take their time and be tougher negotiators. David Lee, who recently moved to Wenham, Mass., to take up a post as an associate professor of physics at Gordon College, has rented a home for his family and says they plan to be “quite picky and choosy” as they look for a home to buy. Dr. Lee doesn’t feel any pressure to decide quickly because he figures prices won’t rise in the near term and could fall further.

A quarterly survey of housing conditions in 28 major metropolitan areas by the Wall Street Journal showed that the inventory of unsold homes at the end of 2006 was up substantially in nearly all of the markets from the already plentiful level of a year earlier. The biggest increases were in the metro areas of Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, Tampa and Jacksonville, Fla.; Phoenix; and Portland, Ore. (Unlike the other cities, Portland had a lean supply of homes a year before.)

The survey also includes recent pricing trends - nearly all negative - based on surveys of real-estate agents by Banc of America Securities in New York, a unit of Bank of America Corp., as well as data on late mortgage payments and job-creation prospects from Moody’s Economy.com, a research firm in West Chester, Pa. Employment figures have a huge effect on housing demand.

Home-price trends vary greatly from one region to another and even within metro areas. For instance, housing demand remains weak in the Detroit area, sapped by auto-related job losses, while the chic urban zones of San Francisco and Manhattan - where space for new construction is extremely limited - generally have stayed firm, though price appreciation is far slower than a year or two ago.

The good news for home sellers is that unemployment remains low in most areas, wages are growing and energy prices have fallen from their recent peaks. What’s more, mortgage interest rates are still low, allowing people with good credit records to obtain 30-year fixed-rate loans at around 6.2 percent.

But many lenders are growing more cautious about how much debt home buyers should be allowed to take on and more inclined to ask for proof of income. This tougher attitude will exclude some marginal buyers from the market, hurting demand, even as a rising number of foreclosures throws more supply on the market. DataQuick Information Systems, a research firm in La Jolla, Calif., said Wednesday that mortgage lenders sent 37,273 default notices to California homeowners in the fourth quarter, up 145 percent from a year earlier and the highest in more than eight years.

Meanwhile, home builders still have lots of unsold homes that they will unload by further cutting prices and dangling such incentives as help with closing costs or kitchen upgrades. Discounts on new houses, in turn, will make it harder for some sellers of previously occupied homes to attract buyers.

Some of the biggest gluts of new homes are in Florida, Phoenix and the outer suburbs of Washington, D.C., says Ivy Zelman, a Cleveland-based housing analyst for Credit Suisse Group. Many of the gluts are due to frantic building of condominiums over the past few years. The supply of condos listed by real-estate agents is up 86 percent from a year earlier in the Las Vegas metro area, 43 percent in Washington, D.C., and 21 percent in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Washington. In Florida’s Miami-Dade and Broward counties, the listed condo supply has more than doubled from a year earlier.

In Miami-Dade, the number of existing condos on the market is enough to last 27 months at the current sales rate, says Jack McCabe, a real-estate consultant in Deerfield Beach, Fla. The oversupply will grow, he says, as about 8,000 condos are expected to be completed this year and 12,000 in 2008.

“It’s going to get bloody down here,” Mr. McCabe says. He estimates that condo prices in Miami-Dade fell between 8 percent and 10 percent last year and will drop 20 percent in 2007. Eventually, he predicts, hedge funds and other investors will step in to buy surplus condos in bulk at huge discounts.

In California’s San Diego County, developers have more than 10,000 condos available for sale in new buildings, projects under construction or properties being converted from rentals, says Peter Dennehy, a senior vice president at Sullivan Group Real Estate Advisors, a consulting firm based there. He says that supply is enough to last more than 20 months at the current sales rate. That number excludes several thousand condos being offered for resale by speculators and others.

Mr. Dennehy estimates that condo prices have fallen at least 15 percent to 20 percent in the county over the past year, though it’s hard to measure price changes because sellers often give incentives such as free upgrades or help with closing costs that aren’t reflected in the price.

In the Boston area, lower-priced homes in blue-chip neighborhoods are moving pretty quickly. But ones that are overpriced or located on main streets are languishing, says Sam Schneiderman, broker-owner of Greater Boston Home Team. “It’s got to be a really good deal,” he says. “An OK deal doesn’t quite cut it. Buyers are holding out.”

The glut in inventories is likely to increase in some markets as sellers try to take advantage of what they hope will be a stronger selling season. Some sellers pulled their homes off the market late last year, intending to relist them in the spring.

At the Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage office in Scottsdale, listings are up roughly 30 percent since the end of December. The office expects listings to increase further in late February and early March as sellers who pulled their homes off the market before the holidays relist them.

Some of last year’s strongest housing markets now are showing signs of cooling a bit. In the San Francisco Bay area, the median price paid for new and resale homes in December was $612,000, up just 0.5 percent from a year earlier, according to DataQuick. But prices fell in parts of the Bay Area; they were down 6.3 percent from a year earlier in Sonoma County and down 5.1 percent in Solano County, DataQuick says.

One of California’s weakest markets last year was the Sacramento area. Anthony Graham, an analyst at Trendgraphix Inc., a provider of housing data, says sellers of previously occupied homes there have had trouble competing with the huge discounts and incentives offered by builders.

Graham expects average home prices in the Sacramento metro area to fall between 6 percent and 8 percent this year, but believes the market will begin to recover modestly by the fourth quarter, assuming that home builders continue to cut their production. Greg Paquin, president of Gregory Group in Folsom, Calif., which gathers data on new home construction throughout the state, also thinks Sacramento is stabilizing after last year’s price cuts. “Buyers who were on the fence are starting to say, ‘Hey, this is a pretty good deal,’ ” Paquin says.

California’s Central Valley, which includes such cities as Bakersfield, Fresno, Merced and Stockton, may take longer to absorb excess new-home inventory and bring prices down to more affordable levels, Mr. Paquin said. He said that area may not bounce back until next year.

In Manhattan, big bonuses recently doled out by Wall Street firms will help support the market in this year’s first half, says Jonathan Miller, chief executive officer of Miller Samuel Real Estate Appraisers in New York. But a rash of new condo developments will help moderate prices. He expects price increases this year to average 5 percent to 6 percent in Manhattan. On Long Island, he believes prices are likely to be flat to slightly higher this year.

In New Jersey, “I’m optimistic that home sales will begin to rebound in the spring,” says Jeffrey Otteau, president of Otteau Valuation Group Inc., an appraisal and research firm in East Brunswick, N.J. “However, that would signal the end of the decline - not a return to higher prices.”

Otteau figures home prices fell an average of about 10 percent in New Jersey last year. For 2007, he believes homes costing less than about $600,000 are likely to rise modestly, around 3 percent, while homes above that level are about flat. In the luxury end of the market, prices may edge down again this year, Mr. Otteau says.

In the Chicago area, some homes that have sat on the market are finally moving, says Barbara O’Connor, an agent with Baird & Warner. But some sellers have had to accept far less than they had hoped for. Jody Andre, a restaurateur, put her three-story Victorian-style home in the Edgewater neighborhood on the market in August at $679,000. She later lowered the price to $634,900 but still got no offers. “This is a hot neighborhood and a lot of people couldn’t understand why the house didn’t sell,” says Andre, who accepted a $605,000 offer last week. “I waited too long to put it on the market,” she says.

The end of the year is normally a slow time, but in some parts of the country traffic has increased in the last month or two, helped by unseasonably warm weather. In Philadelphia’s Center City, buyer traffic began to pick up in November and has continued to climb over the last two months, says Mike McCann, an associate broker with Prudential Fox & Roach, Realtors.

A recent open house for a three-bedroom home priced at $469,000 drew 17 parties, Mr. McCann reports. In the summer and early fall, he says, “we didn’t want to do open houses because it was a wasted day.” Sales are also increasing, but negotiations are taking longer and many offers are contingent on the buyers selling their current homes, Mr. McCann adds. Prudential Fox & Roach is also seeing more people asking to get pre-approved for a mortgage, a sign that they may be ready to buy.

In Atlanta, where the housing market began to soften in August, business started picking up again in December, says Lewis Glenn, president and chief executive of Harry Norman, Realtors. “There’s more negotiation,” and builders are cutting prices and offering concessions, such as buying down the borrower’s mortgage rate, he says.

In Scottsdale, some sellers are cutting prices by 10 percent or more, says Dale Pavlicek, sales manager for the Coldwell Banker Residential office there. “There are a lot of vacant homes on the market,” he says. Sellers who bought in the past year or two are barely breaking even or are coming to the closing table with money to pay off their mortgage and other costs, he adds.

Houston remains one of the nation’s more buoyant housing markets, supported by job growth in the energy industry. Rob Cook, chairman of the Houston Association of Realtors, says the supply of homes on the market is enough to last about six months at the current sales rate - what he calls a “balanced” market. Prices are rising only modestly, though, because Texas has plenty of room for new construction. “We just keep expanding out farther and farther,” Cook says

Scottsdale resale home price tag jumps 15%

Wednesday, December 13th, 2006

Peter Corbett
The Arizona Republic
Dec. 13, 2006 12:00 AM

SCOTTSDALE - Scottsdale’s resale home market surged 15 percent from October to November to a median price of $630,000, according to a monthly report released Tuesday by the Arizona Real Estate Center.

Prices were up 6 percent from a year earlier.

The center, based at Arizona State University, said that the Valley market has settled into a stable pattern after the “hyper-activity of last year.” Sales are on pace with levels of 2003 when 66,260 resale homes changed hands in the metro area.
advertisement

However, sales and prices still are down from their record levels of the past year. Scottsdale has averaged about 408 home sales and 210 condominium sales each month for several months. Both are down about 40 percent from the same period a year ago.

November’s median price was the highest for Scottsdale since June when it peaked at $640,000.

North Scottsdale’s median price was up 12.6 percent from October to November. South Scottsdale’s prices were up 10 percent month-over-month.

The Valley’s median price is $259,000.

Paradise Valley’s median price of $1.69 million, highest in the metro area, is down 2.7 percent from October.

Resale home price tag jumps 15%
Median home price in Scottsdale hits $630K